UnitedHealth Group: HSA Reimbursement Redesign

Optum Bank: HSA Reimbursement Redesign

Transformed a 98.9% abandonment rate into a streamlined experience for 450,000 users.

Project Overview

Role
Lead UX Designer
Organization
United Health Group/Optum Bank
Technologies
React Native, Node.js, AWS OCR, PostgreSQL

Before the redesign, users struggled with a complex reimbursement process that was manual, error-prone, and inflexible. As Lead UX Designer, I worked with cross-functional teams to design an automated, intelligent system that reduced abandonment by 75% and support calls by 52%.

The Challenge

The HSA platform processes $450M annually, but the reimbursement feature was failing with a 98.9% abandonment rate—only 1 in 90 users completed submissions.

Key Problems:

  • • Scattered forms across multiple screens
  • • Generic error messages with no guidance
  • • Inconsistent mobile/desktop experiences

User Impact:

  • • 18-minute average completion time
  • • 22% of support calls were reimbursement-related
  • • "I gave up after it lost my receipt again"

Complexity & Constraints

Multi-User Challenge

Four distinct user types with conflicting needs—from digital natives to assisted users

Technical Constraints

Legacy systems, OCR processing, and mobile network reliability issues

Regulatory Requirements

IRS compliance, HIPAA restrictions, and mandatory audit trails

Cross-device reality: 67% started on mobile, 38% switched to desktop after failures—revealing device choice was context-dependent.

Research Strategy

I needed to understand both user behavior and system constraints without being able to conduct traditional usability testing due to healthcare privacy restrictions. This required creative research approaches and multiple data triangulation methods.

Research Methods

7-week research phase combining data analysis and user research

Data Analysis

  • • 6 months of analytics data identifying 12 drop-off points
  • • 800+ customer service transcripts categorized by issue type
  • • Technical system mapping across 3 backend systems
  • • Heuristic evaluation using healthcare UX principles

User Research

  • • 12 internal stakeholder interviews to understand user workflows and pain points
  • • Process mapping sessions with customer service representatives
  • • Analysis of recorded support call patterns and common issues
  • • Cross-functional workshops with product, engineering, and compliance teams

Key Research Insights

User Mental Models vs. System Logic

Users thought of expenses by event ("my dentist visit") while system organized by tax category ("preventive care")

System Logic

Organized by:

Tax categories (e.g., "preventive care")

Processing:

24-48 hour validation required

Documentation:

Detailed regulatory requirements

👤 User Mental Model

Thinks by:

Events (e.g., "my dentist visit")

Expects:

Immediate feedback and approval

Wants:

Simple yes/no answers

Four Primary User Types Emerged

Digital Natives
32%

Expected instant mobile experience

BEHAVIOR

Abandoned after first failure, expected app-like experience

💻
Traditional Planners
41%

Preferred desktop with detailed forms

BEHAVIOR

Wanted documentation and thorough review process

🤝
Assisted Users
18%

Required customer service help

BEHAVIOR

Needed simplified workflows and guided assistance

Bulk Processors
9%

Business owners with multiple claims

BEHAVIOR

Needed batch processing and CSV upload capabilities

Cross-Device Behavior Pattern

78%

Started on Mobile

45%

Switched After Failure

💻
33%

Completed on Desktop

Typical User Journey

Mobile Start

Upload Fails

💻

Desktop Switch

Mobile Context
  • • Quick receipt capture on-the-go
  • • Expected instant processing
  • • Limited time for complex forms
  • • Camera quality and lighting issues
💻 Desktop Switch Reasons
  • • Better file management capabilities
  • • Easier form completion
  • • More reliable upload experience
  • • Ability to scan documents properly

Key Insight: Device choice was context-dependent—users needed connected experiences across platforms, not identical interfaces. The system needed to maintain state and progress across devices.

Technical Failure Analysis

67%
Upload Failures

File size limit (40%)

Files over 10MB rejected

Network timeout (35%)

Mobile network interruptions

Format issues (25%)

HEIC photos not supported

23%
Validation Errors

Missing receipt date (45%)

OCR couldn't detect date

Amount mismatch (30%)

Manual entry vs. receipt

Invalid category (25%)

Non-HSA eligible expense

10%
User Confusion

Form complexity (50%)

Too many required fields

Process unclear (30%)

No progress indicators

Help unavailable (20%)

No contextual guidance

Common Error Messages (Before Redesign)

"Upload failed. Error code: 413"

❌ User has no idea what this means

✅ Should say: "File too large (max 10MB)"

"Invalid file format"

❌ No guidance on accepted formats

✅ Should say: "Use JPG, PNG, or PDF files"

"Validation failed"

❌ Doesn't specify which field

✅ Should highlight specific errors

"Request timeout"

❌ No recovery suggestion

✅ Should offer retry option

18 min

Avg. time lost per failure

3.2

Retry attempts before giving up

67%

Called support after failure

$2.3M

Annual cost of failures

Design Process: From Research to Solution

Design Methodology

Research → Ideation → Prototyping → Testing → Iteration

Three Design Approaches Evaluated

ApproachDecisionTimelineRationale
Complete Rebuild❌ Rejected18 monthsToo risky for critical healthcare system
Progressive Enhancement✅ Selected6 monthsBalanced risk with faster delivery
Parallel Systems🔄 Pilot only12 monthsGood for A/B testing, high maintenance

Interactive Design Evolution

Progression from existing design to V3 through interactive prototypes.

Mobile Design Evolution

98.9% abandonment to 76% completion rate progression

Existing → V3:1.1% → 76% completion
Time reduction:18 min → 4.5 min
Desktop Design Evolution

Traditional multi-column forms to intelligent progressive disclosure

Existing → V3:12% → 78%
Error reduction:85% → 8%

Key Evolution Insights

Existing Problems:
  • • 8+ overwhelming fields
  • • Confusing medical codes
  • • Generic errors
  • • No upload guidance
  • • No cross-device sync
V3 Solutions:
  • • 3-step guided process
  • • Smart auto-detection
  • • Real-time eligibility
  • • Progressive disclosure
  • • Cross-device sync

Key Design Decisions

Mobile-first with desktop optimization
Adaptive UI by user persona
Cross-device state preservation
Smart assistance over manual entry

Prototyping Timeline

Week 1-2Paper sketches and concept validation
Week 3-4Interactive Figma prototypes for stakeholder review
Week 5-6HTML prototype for technical validation
Week 7-8Production-ready design system implementation

Design Principles

Four core principles guiding all design decisions:

Progressive Confidence

Build trust through transparent feedback, time estimates, and recovery paths.

Context-Aware Guidance

Intelligent help based on receipt type, user history, and experience level.

Graceful Degradation

Functionality across varying network speeds, devices, and scenarios.

Regulatory Transparency

Make compliance requirements helpful by explaining why information is needed.

Smart Receipt Capture Solution

Interactive Mobile Prototype

Redesigned Smart Receipt Capture solution demonstrating the transformation from98.9% abandonment rate to streamlined, user-friendly experience.

Interactive Prototype Features:
  • Guided Receipt Capture: Real-time camera interface with visual frame overlay
  • Smart Form Assistance: Intelligent categorization and pre-populated fields
  • Transparent Status Tracking: Live timeline showing each approval step
  • Optum Bank Design System: Authentic branding and mobile-first interface
User Journey:
  1. 1Start at the HSA Dashboard ($1,671.65 available balance)
  2. 2Tap "Reimburse yourself" to begin
  3. 3Capture receipt with guided camera interface
  4. 4Review with automatic quality validation
  5. 5Complete smart form with detected information
  6. 6Submit and track real-time approval status

*Interactive prototype - Click and interact with the interface above*

Challenge: Photo quality, file formats, upload failures.

Solution: Multi-path capture: mobile camera guidance, document scanner, desktop drag-and-drop, email forwarding.

Technical Implementation Strategy

Mobile Optimization
  • • Progressive image compression pipeline
  • • Client-side validation with immediate feedback
  • • Automatic retry logic for failed uploads
  • • Fallback to smaller image sizes when original fails
Desktop Enhancement
  • • Drag-and-drop upload zone with clear file requirements
  • • Side-by-side layout showing receipt preview and form completion
  • • Detailed help content accessible without leaving the main flow
  • • Batch processing support for bulk users

Receipt Quality Guidance System

Real-time camera overlay with receipt boundaries, progressive upload with visual feedback, thumb-friendly targets for one-handed use.

Intelligent Form Assistance

Previous issues: Long intimidating forms, confusing terminology, poor error handling

New approach: OCR pre-population, smart suggestions, plain-language explanations, progressive disclosure

Example: Smart Recognition in Action

When user uploads receipt from "Dr. Smith Family Practice":

System recognizes provider type and suggests "Office Visit" category
Shows explanation: "Regular doctor visits are HSA eligible"
Pre-fills common fields like date and provider name
Highlights any missing required information

Try the Interactive Form Intelligence

Intelligent form assistance transforms complex medical forms into guided experience withsmart categorization, OCR pre-population, and plain language explanations.

Prototype Features:
  • OCR Detection: Extracts text from receipt images
  • Smart Categories: Rule-based expense classification
  • Plain Language Help: Medical terms explained simply
  • Smart Validation: Real-time field validation
Flow:
  1. 1Start with a receipt from "Dr. Smith Family Practice"
  2. 2OCR extracts provider name, date, and amount
  3. 3System suggests category based on provider type
  4. 4Get plain language eligibility confirmation
  5. 5Review pre-filled form with validation

*Interactive prototype - Click to experience intelligent form assistance*

Status Communication System

Previous issues: Generic "under review" messages buried in dashboard

New system: Multi-channel updates with progress tracking, time estimates, clear explanations

Specific Status Messaging

Instead of: "Under review" → Now: "Verifying receipt details (typically 24 hours)"

Instead of: "Processing" → Now: "Checking HSA eligibility rules (may take 2-3 days for complex cases)"

Instead of: "Complete" → Now: "Processing reimbursement to your account (1-2 business days)"

Cross-Device Design Strategy

Research Finding

78% of users started on mobile but 45% switched to desktop after failures.Device choice was context-dependent, not preference-based.

Platform-Specific Design Adaptations

Each platform leverages its unique strengths while maintaining seamless continuity for device switching.

Mobile-First Approach
Camera-Native Receipt Capture

Real-time receipt boundary detection with guided photo assistance

Touch-Optimized Interactions

Large touch targets, swipe gestures, and thumb-friendly navigation

Offline-First Design

Works without connectivity, syncs when reconnected

Optimized For:

Quick CaptureOn-the-GoSimple Forms
Desktop Enhancement
Bulk Upload & Processing

Drag-and-drop multiple receipts with batch validation

Side-by-Side Layout

Receipt preview alongside form completion for efficiency

Advanced History & Search

Detailed filtering, sorting, and transaction management

Optimized For:

Bulk ProcessingComplex FormsData Analysis

Desktop Cross-Device Experience

Desktop interface supports cross-device workflows with draft detection, mobile upload integration, state restoration.

Before vs After: Desktop Cross-Device Transformation

Compare original desktop experience with V3 cross-device solution. Prototype shows existing fragmented interface vs new integrated design.

Cross-Device Features:
  • Mobile Receipt Integration: Photos taken on mobile appear automatically
  • Draft Restoration: Incomplete mobile submissions resume seamlessly
  • Desktop Enhancements: Drag-and-drop, side-by-side preview
  • Smart Form Fields: OCR data from mobile auto-populates desktop form
Comparison Guide:
  1. 1Toggle between "Existing" and "V3" to see the transformation
  2. 2Notice how V3 shows mobile drafts and cross-device continuity
  3. 3Compare the cluttered existing form vs streamlined V3 layout
  4. 4Test the V3 drag-and-drop and smart form pre-population

Impact: V3 cross-device desktop increased completion rates from 12% to 78%, demonstrating how seamless handoffs improve user success.

Cross-Device User Scenarios

Real User Journey: Sarah's Prescription Reimbursement
1. Mobile Capture

At pharmacy: Quick photo of $127 prescription receipt

2. Auto-Sync

Receipt and OCR data automatically saved to cloud

3. Desktop Completion

Opens laptop, finds draft, completes medical details

4. Submission

Form auto-populated, validated, and submitted successfully

Result: 4-minute total time (vs. 18 minutes), no errors, $127 reimbursement in 2 days.

Technical Cross-Device Architecture

State Management & Sync
  • Real-time synchronization: Redux-persist with WebSocket updates
  • Conflict resolution: Last-write-wins with user confirmation
  • Offline support: Local storage with queue-based sync
  • Session management: JWT tokens with device fingerprinting
Responsive Design Strategy
  • Adaptive breakpoints: 320px, 768px, 1024px, 1440px
  • Progressive enhancement: Core functionality first, enhanced features layer up
  • Touch detection: Automatically adjusts UI density and interactions
  • Network awareness: Reduces image quality on slow connections

Shared Progress

Mobile submissions completed on desktop

Context Preservation

Form data, receipts, status auto-synced

Platform Optimization

Each platform leverages unique strengths vs identical experiences

Cross-Device Impact Metrics

67%
Cross-Device Sessions
Users actively switching between mobile and desktop
89%
Successful Handoffs
Device switches that led to completed submissions
3.2x
Efficiency Gain
Faster completion vs. single-device workflows
Device-Specific Completion Rates
Mobile-only sessions:23%
Desktop-only sessions:54%
Cross-device sessions:78%
User Satisfaction by Platform
Mobile experience:4.2/5
Desktop experience:4.6/5
Cross-device continuity:4.8/5

Working with Engineering Constraints

Collaborated with engineering to redesign system architecture supporting UX goals while maintaining regulatory compliance and reliability.

File Upload Architecture Challenges

Previous Monolithic Approach

  • • Single API handled processing, validation, approval routing
  • • Multiple failures, no granular feedback
  • • Large file uploads caused timeouts
  • • No recovery options for failures

New Collaborative Solution

  • • Chunked upload system for large files
  • • Async processing with transparent feedback
  • • Compression maintaining OCR readability
  • • Offline receipt capture
  • • Transparent retry logic

Technical Implementation Details

Upload Process Improvements
  • • Progressive image compression
  • • Client-side validation with feedback
  • • Background retry with backoff
  • • Size fallback on failure
Performance Optimizations
  • • Lazy loading by receipt type
  • • CDN implementation for static resources
  • • Database optimization (60% improvement)
  • • Client-side preference caching

API Design Collaboration

🤝 Collaborative Design Philosophy

Worked with backend team to create endpoints enabling better UX while maintaining system integrity. Weekly technical sessions balanced UX goals with system constraints.

Key insight: Best UX emerges when design and engineering collaborate early in architecture phase.

API Architecture Evolution

Legacy Monolithic API
📱 Mobile App
Single API Endpoint
POST /api/claims/submit
• File upload
• OCR, validation, routing
💾 Database
⚠️30-45 second processing time
⚠️No granular error feedback
⚠️77% timeout failure rate
New Microservices API
📱 Mobile App
Upload
POST /upload
Process
POST /ocr
Submit
POST /claims
💾 Distributed Storage
2-5 second response time
Real-time progress feedback
94% success rate

Cross-Device API Strategy

🔄Device State Synchronization
📱
Mobile Capture
POST /api/drafts
PUT /api/files/upload
GET /api/ocr/status
☁️
Cloud Sync
WebSocket events
Redis cache
State validation
💻
Desktop Completion
GET /api/drafts/:id
PUT /api/drafts/:id
POST /api/claims/submit
Technical Implementation Details:
  • Session Management: JWT tokens with device fingerprinting
  • Conflict Resolution: Last-write-wins with user confirmation
  • Offline Support: Local storage with queue-based sync
  • Real-time Updates: WebSocket for instant synchronization

Human-Centered API Response Design

📝Error Response Evolution

Legacy Response:

{ "error": "Upload failed", "status": 500 }

❌ No actionable information for users

New UX-Informed Response:

{ "error": "file_too_large", "user_message": "Photo is too large for upload", "action_suggestion": "Try taking a closer photo of just the receipt", "technical_details": { "max_size": "10MB", "received_size": "15.2MB", "alternative_formats": ["JPEG", "PNG"] }, "retry_options": { "auto_compress": true, "manual_crop": "/help/crop-receipt" } }

✅ Clear guidance and recovery options

📊Progress Tracking API

Real-time Status Updates:

{ "status": "processing", "progress": 65, "stage": "ocr_extraction", "stage_description": "Reading receipt details...", "estimated_completion": "15 seconds", "extracted_data": { "provider": "Dr. Smith Family Practice", "amount": "$125.00", "confidence": 0.94 } }

✅ Transparent progress with extracted data preview

Collaborative Design Process

👥Weekly Design-Engineering Sessions
1
UX Requirements
Journey mapping & pain points
2
Technical Constraints
Limitations & security requirements
3
API Co-Design
Joint spec & prototyping
4
User Testing
Validation & iteration
Key Collaboration Outcomes:
  • Error Classification System: 23 specific error types with user-friendly messages
  • Progressive Enhancement: Core functionality works on slow connections
  • Intelligent Retry Logic: Automatic recovery for 80% of temporary failures
  • Performance Budgets: 2-second response time SLA for critical operations

Technical Trade-offs & Decisions

⚖️Performance vs. Security
Challenge:
File encryption required 3-5s overhead, causing abandonment.
Solution:
Progressive encryption: show preview while encrypting in background.
Result: 0.8s perceived upload time, full security compliance
🔄Real-time vs. Battery Life
Challenge:
Real-time sync required persistent connections, draining 40% battery.
Solution:
Smart polling: frequent updates when active, backoff when idle.
Result: 90% battery impact reduction, sub-second sync when needed

📈API Performance Impact

94%
API Success Rate
Up from 23%
2.1s
Average Response Time
Down from 34s
89%
Cross-Device Sync Success
New capability
52%
Support Call Reduction
Better error messages

Key Learning: Design and engineering collaboration on API architecture from start improves both UX and system performance. Collaborative sessions reduced development time and improved outcomes.

Security and Compliance Integration

Healthcare Financial Data Requirements

Healthcare financial data required special handling beyond typical web security. Design decisions balanced user convenience with regulatory compliance.

Security Measures
  • • End-to-end encryption for uploads
  • • User-visible security indicators
  • • Session management balancing security/convenience
  • • Privacy controls for user data agency
Compliance Features
  • • Comprehensive audit trails
  • • Transparent retention policies
  • • Regulatory explanations
  • • Understandable compliance processes

Cross-Functional Collaboration

Product Management

  • • Prioritized mobile based on data
  • • Defined metrics balancing satisfaction + efficiency
  • • Created rollout minimizing disruption

Compliance Team

  • • Designed audit trails
  • • Created educational content for regulations
  • • Implemented transparent retention policies

🎧Customer Service

  • • Built tools showing user experience
  • • Created escalation for complex cases
  • • Designed self-service reducing requests

Performance Impact

94%
Upload Success Rate
(from 23%)
40%
Page Load Improvement
(4.2s → 2.5s)
85%
Fewer Timeout Errors
Server stability
73%
Crash Rate Reduction
Mobile app stability

Technical Innovation Through Constraints

Working within technical limitations—legacy systems, API constraints, processing delays—forced creative solutions providing better UX than unlimited resources might have enabled. Constraints, when properly understood, often lead to more robust and user-friendly solutions than greenfield development.

User Experience Improvements

23%
Task Completion
From 1.1%
12min
Avg Completion Time
From 18 minutes
15%
Mobile Completion
From 0.3%

Business Impact

🏢 Operational Efficiency

Automated workflows dramatically reduced manual processing and support burden, allowing teams to focus on higher-value activities.

😊 Customer Satisfaction

Improved self-service capabilities led to higher platform engagement and reduced customer frustration.

Scalability

The redesigned system now handles increased transaction volume without requiring additional support resources.

Compliance

Enhanced documentation and audit trails improved regulatory adherence and reduced compliance risks.

Key Learnings and Design Insights

Regulation as Feature:Reframed compliance requirements as trust-building opportunities
Multi-Path Solutions:Diverse user needs required fundamentally different approaches
Constraints Drive Innovation:Technical limitations forced creative solutions that improved performance
System-Level Design:Cross-device completion required experience orchestration, not just screen optimization

Long-term Impact & Future Directions

💬
"The redesign transformed our support model and became our blueprint for improving other complex workflows."
Director of Product

Looking for more?

Check out my other projects